They Calls Me Yellow; ‘The Color Purple’ by Alice Walker

I have learnt a new lesson this week, do not sit on a post in the hope you can make it better or come back to it later with the same enthusiasm. Jot down ideas while you read and as they come to you otherwise you will return to the post you left (to ensure you gave it justice) and find you have forgotten half of what you wanted to discuss. I feel better in the knowledge I have worked this out fairly early on into this blogging experiment, but it disappoints me that I may fail to do The Color Purple and Alice Walker justice.

Celie is a poor black woman whose letters tell the story of 20 years of her life, beginning at age 14 when she is being abused and raped by her father and attempting to protect her sister from the same fate, and continuing over the course of her marriage to “Mister,” a brutal man who terrorizes her. Celie eventually learns that her abusive husband has been keeping her sister’s letters from her and the rage she feels, combined with an example of love and independence provided by her close friend Shug, pushes her finally toward an awakening of her creative and loving self.1

Much like mixing nakedness with large bodies of water, as a rule, I generally avoid epistolary novels; I often get bored with the format which can feel flat or hinder depth.2 3 To my surprise The Colour Purple managed to avoid becoming tiresome and successfully rounded each character. It helped that Celie narrated the first half of the novel in her disjointed English, from her language you felt the effort she was putting into what she was writing and the feelings she was expressing. I was more interested in Celie as a character than Nettie; Nettie, the more learned sister, travelled vastly as a missionary and lead an easier (depending how you look at it, I suppose) life, but Celie’s corrupted innocence was the real journey.

When we first meet Celie she is powerless; she is raped by her ‘father’, her children are adopted without her consent, she is married off at 14, beaten by her husband ‘Mister’, and the only person who loves her, her sister Nettie, is driven away by Mister for spurning his advances. Celie sees no worth in her own existence, yet with the introduction of Shug Avery her world is illuminated, she discovers pleasure, love and existing because you are, not because there needs to be a reason to. This is like the colour purple, it exists for no exact reason but to exist; I do not think this was the intended reading, but I have taken it with me. The colour purple, more importantly, is a symbol for Celie beginning to see the beauty in the world where before she only saw pain; Shug is key to this transformation, providing the conditions that allow Celie to love and be loved.

Women are often portrayed as insecure, fickle human beings, but it is the men in this novel who are predominantly insecure and emasculated. Mister can never have the woman he wants; Harpo is expected to, but cannot, ‘control’ Sofia; Shug has a career and is a breadwinner; even Celie begins her own business and escapes the control of Mister. In Celie’s section of the novel all the men are emasculated not only by strong women, but also the abuse and trials they are struggling to overcome; in a thoroughly realistic portrayal each perpetrator of violence or abuse has previously been a victim.

The progression of the male characters is just as fascinating as the female’s; once the men had overcome their anger, anger utilised to regain a semblance of control, they became sympathetic and enjoyable characters. Even Mister, who I despised throughout the majority of the novel, softens as he takes the time to think and realise what he has done, and what he really knows about the world.

‘I think us here to wonder, myself. To wonder. To ast. And that in wondering bout the big things and asting bout the big things, you learn about the little ones, almost by accident. But you never know nothing more about the big things that you start out with. The more I wonder, he say, the more I love.
And people start to love you back, I bet, I say.’

Once conventional notions of gender are dropped and Mister accepts Celie’s new found confidence and sense of self-worth, combating his jealousy and anger, both he and Celie begin to bond. Harpo progresses similarly; he does not want to beat Sophia yet that is what he is told to and expected to act as the man, that he should be the one in charge. He and Sophia eventually reconcile once he accepts her attitude and stops fearing it. The men are just as damaged as the female characters and this adds real depth to the story, there are no real villains, only people stuck in situations they cannot control, each trying to cope differently.

The most difficult situation I felt all the characters shared was the exclusion from their two cultures. In America, as ex-slaves, they are second class citizens and in Africa they are viewed similarly to the white people, never truly accepted into village life but tolerated and humoured. ‘White people busy celebrating they independence from England July 4th, say Harpo, so most black folks don’t have to work. Us can spend the day celebrating each other’. They are stuck in a limbo between two un-accepting worlds, from where they came from to where they are, however, this does not hinder them, they are able to love each other and see the wonder around them without this acceptance; it does not matter.

“The boys now accept Olivia and Tashi in class and more mothers are sending their daughters to school. The men do not like it: who wants a wife who knows everything her husband knows? they fume. But the women have their ways, and they love their children, even their girls.”

  1. Synopsis from GoodReads. []
  2. Nakedness + large bodies of water = skinny dipping []
  3. Epistolary novels are written as a series of documents. []

Before I am 30; a Reading Goal

I am taking a break from my normal posting pattern of postings this week to perfect my blog on The Color Purple; instead I offer you something a little different. Inspired by Simon of Savidge Reads 40 before 40, I am planning on compiling a list of books to read before I am 30. Novels that I not only have a great interest in reading but also classics, trash lit (the rest of Twilight for example; I cannot moan about something I have not read) and books my friends adore; even if these fall outside of what I find interesting and genres I tend to get drawn back to. Like a rebellious child I often stray from classics because I do not believe that the High Canon of literature is correct – this list will help me overcome this preconception.

I will be 30 in 4 years, two months and 10 hours, a large period of time, so I want to make this list expansive but not overwhelming. I would also like to have a reason for reading each one, to assist in motivation. At any point I can add but at no point can I remove a book – everything needs to be tried even if it is not finished. If I dislike or cannot finish anything that is fine; this will be a learning process of reading, and an expansion of taste.

I would really like some recommendations, of books you love and books and authors you have always been told you should read.

So far I have the following:

The Warden by Anthony Trollope
Barchester Towers by Anthony Trollope
The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier
For Whom the Bell Tolls by Ernest Hemingway
Vile Bodies by Evelyn Waugh
The Beautiful and the Damned by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Dune by Frank Herbert
Nineteen Eighty Four by George Orwell
The Wasp Factory by Iain Banks
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austin
Catch 22 by Joseph Heller
Gone With The Wind by Margaret Mitchell
Birdsong by Sebastian Faulk
Twilight novels 3 and 4 by Stehpenie Meyer
The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins

I have included my reasons on my newly created ‘Books Before 30‘ page, to keep track of my progress.

Flickan som lekte med elden; The Girl Who Played with Fire by Stieg Larsson

Concerned you may be old before your time? I am a great lover of Lakelands, C and H Fabrics, creams teas (without the tea part), a brisk walk on a warm (but not scorching) summer’s day through a quaint, historically fascinating village. Oh and I am also 25; fellow elderly youth, let us start a club. Other than the oldies who suspiciously eye you up for invading their aged space, C & H Fabrics is good visit, especially for a cake or vintage looking accessory. I moan enough to be an honorary elderly, why not occasionally join them in their natural environment.1

Pondering being old before your time; I have been contemplating if this could be the reason I am finding more and more things utterly ridiculous. Place a character in a fantasy, dystopian or science fiction environment and I am all for weirdly far-fetched courses of events; removing them from my own normality means I am happy for an author to substitute their own. However, place your elaborate plot into my world and my immediate reaction will be frustration, boredom, or should you be particularly unlucky, both. Do not test my limits of rationality authors, I will only get annoyed. Do not make me shake my walking stick at you; some things just need to make sense.

Mikael Blomkvist, crusading journalist and publisher of the magazine Millennium, has decided to run a story that will expose an extensive sex trafficking operation between Eastern Europe and Sweden, implicating well-known and highly placed members of Swedish society, business, and government.

But he has no idea just how explosive the story will be until, on the eve of publication, the two investigating reporters are murdered. And even more shocking for Blomkvist: the fingerprints found on the murder weapon belong to Lisbeth Salander—the troubled, wise-beyond-her-years genius hacker who came to his aid in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, and who now becomes the focus and fierce heart of The Girl Who Played with Fire.

As Blomkvist, alone in his belief in Salander’s innocence, plunges into an investigation of the slayings, Salander herself is drawn into a murderous hunt in which she is the prey, and which compels her to revisit her dark past in an effort to settle with it once and for all.2

Unlike The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, which began painfully slowly before gaining pace, The Girl who Played with Fire was not such a structured enjoyment. Perhaps because I have issues with middle instalments of trilogies (many have disappointed me), often I found myself beginning to enjoy the book only to be set back by intermittent periods of boredom, becoming tired of the plot lines I was given. This is by no means a bad book, I did enjoy reading it, I was only disappointed by its inconsistency.

Larsson does not disconcert with the effort he puts into his subject matter, which was once again interesting and thought out. You could not criticise Larsson for lacking dedication to the serious matters he depicts, his work feels akin to a true crime novel with the level of detail he devotes. He also allocates enough attention to his key characters to leave them once again glued in my mind, contemplating their intricacies. However, unlike The Girl with a Dragon Tattoo Larsson over-packed his antagonists.

My main gripe came in the form of Zala, our villain. While I understood why Zala being related to Salander thus explained the problems she experienced after ‘All the Evil’, the nature of its culmination felt almost unnecessary, and far-fetched. I would have preferred Salander to have been let down by the system without the vicious leader of a trafficking gang being pivotal. I am unsure as to why this has suddenly bothered me, as the events of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo do not occur daily; but The Girl who Played with Fire seemed to go beyond my limits of acceptability. Individually, henchman Niedermann, the trafficking, Svensson and Johansson murders and Salander’s questionable guilt/morality work perfectly. Combining them was tricky, and up until near the end of the book were marginally successful, yet the ending itself fell flat, for me anyway. When characters get too clever, out-doing their character flaws, there is real ‘Mary-Sue’ risk; Salander crossed this line marginally, Zala flung himself over it. Without spoiling the ending, there are certain near death experiences depicted which are really just death experiences.

I left this novel satisfied yet frustrated; Salander is one of my favourite characters, not only in this series but fiction itself. She is a moral conundrum, a man hater, misunderstood wonder and a fantastic feminist aspect to the novel. Her newly found death-surviving abilities have dampened this admiration; it has morphed her from accessible to unbelievable. Salander hates men who hate women from experience, however, she could have easily hated women were her parental roles reversed. While Larsson is wonderfully pro-women, situations seem to stem from or lead back to men. Even Berger, a wonderfully strong woman, practically runs her life around Blomkvist; she always has to trust him, they cannot seem to escape each other. I would have enjoyed some equality because that is how it should be, as a given, not something to be account for or constantly explained.

I have given a little more space to my gripes in this post than aspects I enjoyed; this is a marvellous book otherwise I would not want to discuss it in this matter. Anything that can get you talking and debating is worth the reading.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
  1. This is not a sponsored post []
  2. Synopsis from Goodreads. []